as generally singular. Once Mrs.

    Buckland found , ement: “My dear, I believe t Csteps are undoubtedly testudinal.”

    togeto tcclote,oise.

    Plunking it onto te, t foro t t itsfootprints did indeed matcudying. C Buckland a buffoon—t  Lyell appeared to find o go touring land in 1824. It er trip t Lyell decided to abandon a career in lae o geology full-time.

    Lyell remely ssig t of ,ually  altogetpeculiarity , ed by t, of taking up improbable positions onfurniture—lying across ting  of a canding up” (to quote en   tocks  touc King’s College in London from 1831 to 1833. It imet ed upon ts first voiced byton a generation earlier. (Altton in tudent of Playfair’s reon’s day and Lyell’s troversy, en confused unian–Plutonian dispute. ttlebecame an argument betastroparianism—unattractive terms for animportant and very long-running dispute. Catastrops, as you mig from t t cataclysmic events—floods principally, ropunism are often ogetastropicularly comforting to clerics like Buckland because it alloo incorporate to serious scientific discussions. Uniformitarians by contrast believedt c nearly all Eartime. ton  it  people read, and so  people’s minds, t.

    Lyell believed t ts eady—t everyt  could be explained by events still going on today. Lyell and s didn’t just disdain catastropested it. Catastrops believed textinctions  of a series in  and replaceds—a belief t turalist t. o “a succession ofrubbers of  t table and called for a neoo convenient a o explain ted