direction at precisely ts at ty of Geneva sent ponsseven miles in opposite directions and demonstrated t interfering antaneous response in ther.

    tc at one conference Bo tion   rate tuitive nature of tum in  om of a radioactive substanceattaco a vial of icle degraded  riggera mec . If not, t   kno to regard t as 100 percent alive and 100 percent dead at time. tepoucandable excitement, t one cannot “predictfuture events exactly if one cannot even measure t state of the universe precisely!”

    Because of its oddities, many ps disliked quantum t least certain aspectsof it, and none more so tein. ttle ironic since it imes like ion at t of tum tely, but  like it. “God doesn’t play dice,” he said.

    4Einstein couldn’t bear tion t God could create a universe in  a distance—t one particle couldinstantaneously influence anotrillions of miles aark violation of tivity. t notrace t andyet s insisting t, some tomic level, information could.

    (No one, incidentally, icles ac. Scientists  o t Yakir A tit.”)Above all, t quantum produced a level of untidiness t previously existed. Suddenly you needed ts of lao explain tum tivity for ty of relativity t at explaining ed suns or o cluster, but turned out to  all at ticle level. to explain  atoms togetrong nuclear force and rong forcebinds atoms toget’s ons to bed doogetasks, mostly to do rolling tes of certainsorts of radioactive decay.

    te its name, is ten billion billion billion times stronger ty, and trong nuclear fo